Integrasi Kecerdasan Buatan dan Nilai-nilai Islam dalam Pembelajaran Madrasah Ibtidaiyah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54213/tanzhimuna.v6i1.1032Keywords:
Kecerdasan Buatan, Nilai-nilai Islam, Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, Etika Digital, Literasi AI IslamAbstract
Perkembangan kecerdasan buatan (AI) memberikan peluang untuk meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, namun juga menimbulkan isu terkait akurasi informasi, ketergantungan teknologi, privasi, dan kesesuaiannya dengan nilai-nilai Islam. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis bentuk integrasi AI dan nilai-nilai Islam dalam pembelajaran Madrasah Ibtidaiyah serta menjelaskan peran guru dalam mengendalikan penggunaannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus interpretatif. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara semi-terstruktur, observasi pembelajaran, dan analisis dokumen, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan analisis tematik reflektif. Hasil studi menunjukkan tiga pola integrasi. Pertama, AI digunakan untuk mempersonalisasi materi, bahasa, dan tingkat kesulitan tugas berdasarkan kebutuhan siswa sambil tetap mempertimbangkan keadilan, martabat, dan pembentukan moral. Kedua, AI membantu guru mengembangkan media interaktif dalam bentuk cerita digital, ilustrasi, kuis, dan aktivitas reflektif, tetapi nilai pendidikannya ditentukan oleh keterlibatan kognitif siswa dan bimbingan guru. Ketiga, penggunaan AI disertai dengan pengembangan etika digital melalui prinsip tabayyun, kepercayaan akademik, perlindungan privasi, dan tanggung jawab moral. Penelitian ini menekankan bahwa AI tidak dapat ditempatkan sebagai otoritas pengetahuan atau pengganti guru, melainkan sebagai wasīlah pedagogis yang penggunaannya harus tunduk pada tujuan pendidikan Islam. Kontribusi penelitian terletak pada perumusan kerangka integrasi AI yang menggabungkan personalisasi pembelajaran, interaktivitas pendidikan, dan literasi AI Islam.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, Article 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051
Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K–12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2(3), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7
Indonesian Internet Service Providers Association. (2024, February 7). APJII: The number of Indonesian internet users has reached 221 million people. https://apjii.or.id/berita/d/apjii-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-221-juta-orang
Boulhrir, T., & Hamash, M. (2025). Unpacking artificial intelligence in elementary education: A comprehensive thematic analysis systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, Article 100442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100442
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke's approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
Casal-Otero, L., Catala, A., Fernández-Morante, C., Taboada, M., Cebreiro, B., & Barro, S. (2023). AI literacy in K–12: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7
Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
Elmahjub, E. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) in Islamic ethics: Towards pluralist ethical benchmarking for AI. Philosophy & Technology, 36, Article 73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00668-x
Faizin, N., Alfan, M., Basid, A., Ramadhan, M. R., Panatik, S. A., & Kawakip, A. N. (2025). Muslim students' acceptance of artificial intelligence in Islamic religious education: An extended TAM approach. Discover Education, 4, Article 304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00767-1
Filiz, O., Kaya, M. H., & Adiguzel, T. (2025). Teachers and AI: Understanding the factors influencing AI integration in K–12 education. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 17931–17967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13463-2
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, Article 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Buckingham Shum, S., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
Kajiwara, Y., & Kawabata, K. (2024). AI literacy for ethical use of chatbot: Will students accept AI ethics? Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100251
Kosmas, P., Nisiforou, E. A., Kounnapi, E., Sophocleous, S., & Theophanous, G. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence in literacy lessons for elementary classrooms: A co-design approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73, 2589–2615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10492-z
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
Ma, M., Ng, D. T. K., Liu, Z., & Wong, G. K. W. (2025). Fostering responsible AI literacy: A systematic review of K–12 AI ethics education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100422
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693
Molenaar, I. (2022). Towards hybrid human–AI learning technologies. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 632–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12527
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2023). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical Teacher, 45(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287
Raquib, A., Channa, B., Zubair, T., & Qadir, J. (2022). Islamic virtue-based ethics for artificial intelligence. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00028-2
Tagare, D., Karki, T., & Yu, W. (2025). K–12 teachers' ethical competencies for AI literacy: Insights from a systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 239, Article 105435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105435
UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Report Team. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/publication/technology
United Nations Children's Fund. (2021). Policy guidance on AI for children (Version 2.0). UNICEF Office of Global Insight and Policy. https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/media/1341/file/UNICEF-Global-Insight-policy-guidance-AI-children-2.0-2021.pdf
Veldhuis, A., Lo, P. Y., Kenny, S., & Antle, A. N. (2025). Critical artificial intelligence literacy: A scoping review and framework synthesis. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 43, Article 100708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100708Top of Form
